Casey Anthony's not guilty verdict has been debated and contested by pretty much everyone from the common citizens to celebrities and news commenters. Of course, in her latest column Ann Coulter spoke out on the situation. Now much to my own shame, I did agree with parts of it.

As long as we're looking for new revenue streams, how about billing these white trash low-lifes for their massive consumption of police resources? The dregs of society need to be assessed a fee for their abuse of government services and thrown in debtors prison in the unlikely event that they can't pay.

I also agree that Caylee would have been better off if her mom had giv
But of course, she used this as an opertunity to bash single mothers. Of course she had statstics to back up her therories. But as everyone knows, most statistics are made up on the spot, and you can find research to support almost any claim.
And while there are plenty of examples of children of single mothers growing up to be delinquents, but would there life be better just because they have two parents?
While there are many benefits to a two family household, if a mother is "white trash" or a loser of any skin tone, will being married really matter? Like attracts like. So wouldn't a loser simply be married to another loser? Thus leaving the child in the care of two loser instead of one.

Read the columbhttp://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-07-06.html

I'm going to get bitch slapped, and maybe I will deserve it.

The media, and most of the liberal world has launched an attack on Miss California after she answered Perez Hilton's question concerning whether other states should allow same sex marriage. She stated that she believed marriage should be between a man and WOMAN.
In case you forgot her wording, I put the video below.



Now, after reading Ann Coulter's webpage, I must express that I agree with her, somewhat. ( I HATE TO SAY THAT!!!) It is unfair to accuse miss California of "hate speech." Coulter was right in pointing out that Miss Cali couldn't have sugar-coated her answer or tip toes around the issue any more than she did. Further, she was forced to answer the question, it isn't as if she used the fact that she had such a large audience as a forum to go on an anti-gay rampage.

Now, while I don't agree with her opinion, she does have a right to her own opinion . Many people in this country were raised with the belief that marriage should be reserved for men and women. Should she have lied? Should she have pretend she was in favor of it, just to let the judges hear what they wanted to hear? Should she really sell out her believes for a beauty pageANT Crown? Again, I am in full support of gay marriage. As Chris Rock said, Homosexuals deserve to be as miserable as everyone else! However, I have a friends who have religious beliefs that lead them to disagree with me on that. They are hateful or homophobic. They don't believe that homosexuals should be stripped of all rights. But for some people, tradition isn't as easy to break.

Oh, and in response to the other part of Coulter's column...Puh-lease. We don't hate Palin b/c she's pretty...we hate on her because she's dumb. And Yes, Miss California is pretty, but Paula Jones? She looked like an aardvark.